Features of Supplemental Feeding Implementation and Physical Development of Infants
https://doi.org/10.15690/pf.v20i1.2523
Abstract
Background. Balanced feeding with timely supplemental feeding implementation ensures optimal rates of physical and psychomotor development. It is the most effective way for preventing chronic non-communicable diseases and programming health during human life.
Objective. The aim of the study is to analyze the timing of the supplemental feeding administration in infants regarding their physical development.
Methods. Online questionnaire was developed via Google Forms. Responses from mothers of 108 children aged from 5 months to 3 years were analyzed. Physical development was evaluated via the WHO Anthro program.
Results. The timing of first supplemental feeding implementation corresponded to the Optimizing program on infants feeding in Russian Federation (2019) in 89.8% (n = 97) of cases, after 6 months — 6.5% (n = 7) of cases, and before 4 months — 3.7% (n = 4) of cases. The first supplemental feeding most commonly was vegetable puree (65.7%; n = 71), less often — porridge (18.5%; n = 20), or fruit puree (13.9%; n = 15). The meat puree was implemented after 8 months in 57.4% (n = 62) of cases. The mean of z-score for the body mass index to age ratio in children with late supplemental feeding implementation was − 1.1 ± 0.58. It has turned out to be significantly lower than in case of timely administration: 0.08 ± 0.11; p ≤ 0.05.
Conclusion. Late supplemental feeding administration (especially foods with high biological value) resulted in nutritional status violation through body weight deficiency in children both on breastfeeding and formula feeding.
About the Authors
Yulia O. TkachRussian Federation
Yekaterinburg
Disclosure of interest:
Not declared.
Larisa V. Levchuk
Russian Federation
Yekaterinburg
Disclosure of interest:
Not declared.
References
1. Programma optimizatsii vskarmlivaniya detei pervogo goda zhizni v Rossiiskoi Federatsii: Methodological recommendations. Federal State Autonomous Institution “National Medical Research Center for Children’s Health” of the Ministry of Health of Russia. Moscow; 2019. (In Russ).
2. Skvortsova VA, Borovik TE, Fisenko AP, et al. Results evaluation of the implementation of the “Program for Optimizing Feeding of Children in the First Year of Life in the Russian Federation” dated 2009. Pediatrics. Consilium Medicum. 2022;(4):286–294. (In Russ). doi: https://doi.org/10.26442/265 86630.2022.4.201969
3. Agostoni C, Decsi T, Fewtrell M, et al. Complementary feeding: a commentary by the ESPGHAN Committee on Nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2008;46(1):99–110. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mpg.0000304464.60788.bd
4. Dube K, Schwartz J, Mueller MJ, et al. Complementary food with low (8%) or high (12%) meat content as source of dietary iron: a doubleblinded randomized controlled trial. Eur J Nutr. 2010;49(1):11–18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-009-0043-9
5. Fewtrell M, Bronsky J, Campoy C, et al. Complementary Feeding: A Position Paper by the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) Committee on Nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2017;64(1):119–132. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0000000000001454
6. Lukoyanova OL, Borovik TE, Skvortsova VA, et al. Best Time to Begin Complementary Feeding of Full-Term Exclusively Breastfed Infants: Results of an Observational Study. Voprosy sovremennoi pediatrii — Current Pediatrics. 2016;15(4):371–378. (In Russ). doi: https://doi.org/10.15690/vsp.v15i4.1588
Review
For citations:
Tkach Yu.O., Levchuk L.V. Features of Supplemental Feeding Implementation and Physical Development of Infants. Pediatric pharmacology. 2023;20(1):42-46. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15690/pf.v20i1.2523