INTRAVENOUS FLUORESCEIN ADMINISTRATION SAFETY AT CONFOCAL LASER ENDOMICROSCOPY OF GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT IN CHILDREN
https://doi.org/10.15690/pf.v10i5.824
Abstract
Confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) is a method of optic biopsy, which allows obtaining histologic presentation of mucous tunic in real time and quickly differentiating between unaltered and inflamed, metaplastic and dysplastic tissue structures, thus developing a new and safe method of early diagnostics of diseases. Intravenous administration of 10% sodium fluorescein is necessary in order to obtain high-contrast images of the structure of digestive tract’s mucous tunic, although there have been no direct indications to that in the world pediatric practice. The authors examined 124 children of 3-18 years of age who received intravenous fluorescein of 5 mg/kg. No severe side effects were revealed at intravenous administration. The authors revealed temporary yellowing of skin and bright coloration of urine. In terms of mild side effects, the authors observed insignificant nausea and emesis in 2 children (1.6%). Strict observation of the selection protocol allows not only avoiding severe complications caused by administration of the drug, but also recommending its use at CLE of digestive tract’s mucous tunic in children.
About the Authors
A. A. Shavrov (Junior)Russian Federation
endoscopist of the endoscopy department at the research institute of pediatrics of the FSBI “SCCCH”
A. E. Alexandrov
Russian Federation
A. A. Shavrov
Russian Federation
A. Y. Kharitonova
Russian Federation
G. V. Volynets
Russian Federation
A. G. Talalaev
Russian Federation
References
1. Venediktova M. M., Shavrov A. A. Voprosy diagnostiki v pediatrii = Diagnostics in pediatrics. 2012; 4: 17–21.
2. Wallace M. B., Fockens P. Probe-based confocal laser endomicriscopy. Gastroenterology. 2009; 136: 1509–13.
3. Becker V., von Delius S., Bajbouj M., Karagianni A., Schmid R. M., Meining A. Intravenous application of fluorescein for confocal laser scanning microscopy: evaluation of contrast dynamics and image quality with increasing injection-to-imaging time. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 68: 319–23.
4. Markova E. Yu. Differentsial'naya diagnostika i lechenie zabolevanii glaznogo dna u detei. Avtoref. dis. … dokt. med. nauk [Differential Diagnosis and Treatment of Diseases of the Fundus in Children. Author’s abstract]. Moscow, 2008. P. 55.
5. Mandava N., Reichel E., Guyer D. Fluorescein and ICG Angiography, 2nd edn. St Louis: Mosby. 2004; 106: 800–808.
6. Yannuzzi L. A., Rohrer K. T., Tindel L. J. et al. Fluorescein angiography complicationsurvey. Ophthalmology. 1986; 93: 611–7.
7. Kwan A. S., Barry C., McAllister I. L., Constable I. Fluorescein angiography and adverse drug reactions revisited: the Lions Eye experience. Clin. experiment ophthalmol. 2006; 34: 33–8.
8. Lopez-Saez M. P., Ordoqui E., Tornero P. et al. Fluoresceininduced allergic reaction. Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1998; 81: 428–30.
9. Jennings B. J., Mathews D. E. Adverse reactions during retinal fluorescein angiography. J. Am. Optom. Assoc. 1994; 65: 465–71.
10. Moosbrugger K. A., Sheidow T. G. Evaluation of the side effects and image quality during fluorescein angiography comparing 2 mL and 5 mL sodium fluorescein. Can J. Ophthalmol. 2008; 43: 571–5.
Review
For citations:
Shavrov (Junior) A.A., Alexandrov A.E., Shavrov A.A., Kharitonova A.Y., Volynets G.V., Talalaev A.G. INTRAVENOUS FLUORESCEIN ADMINISTRATION SAFETY AT CONFOCAL LASER ENDOMICROSCOPY OF GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT IN CHILDREN. Pediatric pharmacology. 2013;10(5):59-58. https://doi.org/10.15690/pf.v10i5.824