Correlations Between Cognitive and Social Functioning of Schoolchildren: Study of Population Data Using methods of intellectual Analysis of heterogeneous Data

Background. The comprehensive assessment of mentality in children on the population scale is necessary to develop measures for optimal shaping of the country’s future potential. However, the correlations between cognitive and socio-characterological parameters of the emerging personality makes it difficult to collect information and decreases the efficiency of traditional analysis methods on the population scale.

The aim of the study is to estimate the correlations between cognitive activity social functioning of schoolchildren using artificial intelligence methods.

Methods. The study included schoolchildren from 5th and 9th grades who studied in secondary schools in 8 major Russian cities. The survey used a battery of tests to assess cognitive performance and a questionnaire of extracurricular activities which was completed by parents. The analysis was performed using clustering and machine learning methods.

Results. The battery of cognitive tests was used to examine 1983 children from 5th and 9th grades. Parents of 1,171 of them completed the extracurricular activity questionnaire. Two clusters of different levels of cognitive success of children and adolescents in both age groups were identified. The high level of cognitive activity was determined in cases associated with attending music school, non-sports hobbies in schoolchildren of both age groups in general; basketball, football, dancing, summer holidays in camps in 5th grade schoolchildren; and swimming, skiing, competitive sports (non-professional), tutoring sections, computer programming in 9th grade schoolchildren.

 Conclusion. The correlations between the level of cognitive activity and the individual typology of extracurricular activities (based on features of personality formation and social influence of the family) has been determined.

1. Baranov AA, Namazova-Baranova LS, Il’in AG. Maintenance and health promotion of adolescent — pledge of sustainable development of society and state (Current Status of the Issue). Annals of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences. 2014;69(5-6):65–70. (In Russ).

2. Rees P. The mental health, emotional literacy, cognitive ability, literacy attainment and ‘resilience’ of ‘looked after children’: a multidimensional, multiple-rater population based study. Br J Clin Psychol. 2013;52(2):183–198. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12008.

3. Taylor ZE, Eisenberg N, Spinrad TL, et al. The relations of ego-resiliency and emotion socialization to the development of empathy and prosocial be-havior across early childhood. Emotion. 2013;13(5):822–831. doi.org/10.1037/a0032894.

4. Krapohl E, Rimfeld K, Shakeshaft NG, et al. The high heritability of educational achievement reflects many genetically influenced traits, not just intelligence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(42):15273–15278. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1408777111.

5. Loukusa S, M kinen L, Kuusikko-Gauffin S, et al. Theory of mind and emotion recognition skills in children with specific language impairment, autism spectrum disorder and typical development: group differences and connection to knowledge of grammatical morphology, word-finding abilities and verbal working memory. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2014;49(4):498–507. doi: 10.1111/14606984.12091.

6. Fenning RM, Baker JK, Baker BL, Crnic KA. Parenting children with borderline intellectual functioning: a unique risk population. Am J Ment Retard. 2007;112(2):107–121. doi: 10.1352/0895-8017(2007)112[107:PCWBIF]2.0.CO;2.

7. Afifi TO, Mather A, Boman J, et al. Childhood adversity and personality disorders: results from a nationally representative population-based study. J Psychiatr Res. 2011;45(6):814–822. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.11.008.

8. Vrijmoeth C, Monbaliu E, Lagast E, Prinzie P. Behavioral problems in children with motor and intellectual disabilities: prevalence and associations with maladaptive personality and marital relationship. Res Dev Disabil. 2012;33(4):1027–1038. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2012.01.010.

9. Mavroveli S, Petrides KV, Sangareau Y, Furnham A. Exploring the relationships between trait emotional intelligence and objective socio-emotional outcomes in childhood. Br J Educ Psychol. 2009;79(Pt 2):259–272. doi: 10.1348/000709908X368848.

10. Fareed M, Afzal M. Estimating the inbreeding depression on cognitive behavior: a population based study of child cohort. PLoS One. 2014;9(10):e109585. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109585.

11. Calvin CM, Deary IJ, Webbink D, et al. Multivariate genetic analyses of cognition and academic achievement from two population samples of 174,000 and 166,000 school children. Behav Genet. 2012;42(5):699–710. doi: 10.1007/s10519-012-9549-7.

12. Ding C, He X. K-nearest-neighbor consistency in data clustering: incorporating local information into global optimization. Proc. ACM Symp. Applied Computing (SAC); 2004. Pp. 584–589.

13. Rousseeuw PJ. Silhouettes: A graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. Computational and Applied Mathematics. 1987;20:53–65. doi: 10.1016/03770427(87)90125-7.

14. Soldatova GU, Rasskazova EI, Zotova EYu. Russian teenagers and parents: online competence and risks. Akademicheskiy vestnik Akademii sotsial’nogo upravleniya. 2017;(3):7–18. (In Russ).

15. Devyaterikova AA, Ismatullina VI, Kasatkin VN, Malykh SB. Ispol’zovaniye batarei neyropsikhologicheskikh testov cantab dlya otsenki kognitivnykh funktsiy v shkol’nom vozraste. (Conference proceedings) Materialy konferentsii «Kognitivnaya nauka v Moskve: novyye issledovaniya» ed. by E.V. Pechenkovа, M.V. Falikman. Moscow; 2019. Рр. 598– 602. (In Russ).

16. Soldatova GU, Vishneva AE. Features of the development of the cognitive sphere in children with different online activities: is there a golden mean? Konsul’tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya. 2019;27(3):97–118. (In Russ). doi: 10.17759/cpp.2019270307.