Opportunities for Prevention and Rehabilitation Treatment of the Consequences of Perinatal Central Nervous System Damage in Premature Infants

The socio-economic burden of the consequences of perinatal central nervous system damage in preterm infants remains an urgent healthcare issue. The review discusses the modern concepts of cerebral ischemia pathogenesis in prematures, the peculiarities of diagnosing structural brain lesions, and the ability to predict motor deficits in the future. The possibilities of assessing mental, motor development and social adaptation disorders of premature infants with consequences of perinatal pathology in the early stages of ontogenesis are described.. The modern views on rehabilitation and restorative treatment of premature infants with combined perinatal pathology are highlighted. The characteristics of non-invasive methods for early diagnosis of central nervous system pathology and therapeutic methods with the rationale for choosing preventive and curative measures and the further prediction of the disease course and outcome are given. The world experience of multidisciplinary rehabilitation of premature infants with combined perinatal pathology is highlighted.

1. Cheong JL, Doyle LW. Increasing rates of prematurity and epidemiology of late preterm birth. J Pediatr Child Health. 2012;48(9):784–788. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2012.02536.x.

2. Beck S, Wojdyla D, Say L, et al. The worldwide incidence of preterm birth: a systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity. Bull World Health Organ. 2010;88(1):31–38. doi: 10.2471/BLT.08.062554.

3. Sovremennye mediko-sotsial’nye problemy neonatologii. Ed by A.A. Baranov, G.V. Yatsyk. Moscow: Pediatr””; 2015. pp. 39–52. (In Russ).

4. Soll RF. Progress in the care of extremely preterm infants. JAMA. 2015;314(10):1007–1008. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.10911.

5. Ballot DE, Chirwa T, Ramdin T, et al. Comparison of morbidity and mortality of very low birth weight infants in a Central Hospital in Johannesburg between 2006/2007 and 2013. BMC Pediatr. 2015;15(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12887-015-0337-4.

6. Petrou S. The economic consequences of preterm birth during the first 10 years of life. BJOG. 2005;112 Suppl 1:10–15. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00577.x.

7. Vinogradova IV. Morbidity and mortality of children born with an extremely low weight. Vestnik Chuvashskogo universiteta. 2012;(3):335–341. (In Russ).

8. Yatsyk GV, Belyaeva IA, Bombardirova EP, et al. The specific features of medical examination of neonates and babies. Russian journal of pediatrics. 2012;(2):22–26. (In Russ).

9. Doyle LW, Roberts G, Anderson PJ; Victorian Infant Collaborative Study Group. Changing long-term outcomes for infants 500-999 g birth weight in Victoria, 1979-2005. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2011;96(6):F443–447. doi: 10.1136/adc.2010.200576.

10. Kumar P, Shankaran S, Ambalavanan N, et al. Characteristics of extremely low birth weight infant survivors with unimpaired outcomes at 30 months of age. J Perinatol. 2013;33(10):800–805. doi: 10.1038/jp.2013.71.

11. Gargus RA, Vohr BR, Tyson JE, et al. Unimpaired outcomes for extremely low birth weight infants at 18 to 22 months. Pediatrics. 2009;124(1):112–121. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-2742.

12. Vlasyuk VV. Rodovaya travma i perinatal’nye narusheniya mozgovogo krovoobrashcheniya. St. Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya; 2009. 252 p. (In Russ).

13. Barashnev YuI, Rozanov AV, Panov VO, Volobuev AI. Role of hypoxically traumatic brain injuries in the formation of childhood disability. Rossiiskii vestnik perinatologii i pediatrii. 2006;51(4):41–46. (In Russ).

14. Volpe JJ. The encephalopathy of prematurity — brain injury and impaired brain development inextricably intertwined. Semin Pediatr Neurol. 2009;16(4):167–178. doi: 10.1016/j.spen.2009.09.005.

15. Namazova-Baranova LS, Deev IA, Kobyakova OS, et al. Features of somatic pathology in children with low, very low and extremely low birth weight at different ages of life (review of the world literature). Bulletin of Siberian medicine. 2016;15(4):140–149. (In Russ).] doi: 10.20538/1682-0363-2016-4-140-149.

16. Himpens E, Van den Broeck C, Oostra A, et al. Prevalence, type, distribution, and severity of cerebral palsy in relation to gestational age: a meta-analytic review. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008;50(5):334–340. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2008.02047.x.

17. Departament analiza, prognoza i innovatsionnogo razvitiya zdravookhraneniya, Tsentral’nyi nauchno-issledovatel’skii institut organizatsii i informatizatsii zdravookhraneniya. Statisticheskie materialy po zabolevaemos-ti detskogo naseleniya Rossii. Ministerstvo zdravookhraneniya Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Moscow; 2012. (In Russ).

18. Аltunin VV, Antonov AG, Baranov AA, et al. Sovremennye podkhody k profilaktike, diagnostike i lecheniyu bronkholegochnoi displazii. Rukovodstvo dlya praktikuyushchikh vrachei. Moscow: Pediatr»; 2013. 176 p. (In Russ)

19. Davydova IV. Formirovanie, techenie i iskhody bronkholegochnoi displazii u detei. [dissertation abstract] Moscow; 2010. 48 p. (In Russ).

20. Printsipy etapnogo vykhazhivaniya nedonoshennykh detei. Ed by L.S. Namazova-Baranova. Moscow: Pediatr””; 2013. pp. 85–94. (In Russ).

21. Yang Y, Rosenberg GA. Blood-Brain barrier breakdown in acute and chronic cerebrovascular disease. Stroke. 2012;(1):91–96. (In Russ).

22. Fan X, Kavelaars A, Heijnen CJ, et al. Pharmacological neuroprotection after perinatal hypoxic-ischemic brain injury. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2010;8(4):324–334. doi: 10.2174/157015910793358150.

23. Pal’chik AB. Sostoyanie nervnoi sistemy novorozhdennykh. Metodicheskie rekomendatsii. St. Petersburg: SPBGPMA; 2004. 22 p. (In Russ).

24. Order of the Ministry of Health No.921n “Ob utverzhdenii Poryadka okazaniya meditsinskoi pomoshchi po profilyu “neonatologiya” dated 2012 November 15. (In Russ).

25. Pal’chik AB, Fedorova LA. Periventrikulyarnaya leikomalyatsi-ya. Metodicheskie rekomendatsii. St. Petersburg: SPBGPMA; 2008. 45 p. (In Russ).

26. Pal’chik AB, Shabalov NP. Gipoksicheski-ishemicheskaya entsefalopatiya norozhdennykh. Moscow: MEDpress-inform; 2013. 288 p. (In Russ).

27. Ignatko IV, Rybin MV, Kalinina EM. Patogenez perinatal’nykh narushenii pri beremennosti vysokogo riska. Problems of practical pediatrics. 2006;(4):27. (In Russ).

28. Goncharova ОV, Bakanov МI, Greshilov AA, et al. Current biochemicalcriteria for the diagnosis of perinatal hypoxic CNS lesions in the newborn. Russian journal of pediatrics. 2007;(4):13–18. (In Russ).

29. de Vries LS, Benders MJ, Groenendaal F. Progress in neonatal neurology with a focus on neuroimaging in the preterm infant. Neuropediatrics. 2015;46(4):234–241. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1554102.

30. Wezel-Meijler Gv, de Vries LS. Cranial ultrasound — optimizing utility in the NICU. Curr Pediatr Rev. 2014;10(1):16–27. doi: 10.217 4/157339631001140408120106.

31. Panigrahy A, Wisnowski JL, Furtado A, et al. Neuroimaging bio-markers of preterm brain injury: toward developing the preterm con-nectome. Pediatr Radiol. 2012;42 Suppl 1:S33–61. doi: 10.1007/ s00247-011-2239-4.

32. Stoll BJ, Hansen NI, Bell EF, et al. Neonatal outcomes of extremely preterm infants from the NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Pediatrics. 2010;126(3):443–456. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-2959.

33. Harteman JC, Groenendaal F, van Haastert IC, et al. Atypical timing and presentation of periventricular haemorrhagic infarction in preterm infants: the role of thrombophilia. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2012;54(2):140–147. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2011.04135.x.

34. Vlasyuk VV. Clinical and morphological classification of cerebral intraventricular hemorrhages. Current pediatrics. 2013;12(6):48–52. (In Russ). doi: 10.15690/vsp.v12i6.873.

35. Odinak MM, Tsygan NV. Faktory rosta nervnoi tkani v tsentral’noi nervnoi sisteme. St. Petersburg: Nauka; 2005. 157 p. (In Russ).

36. Marro PJ. The etiology and pharmacologic approach to hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy in the newborn. Neoreviews. 2007;3(6):e99–107. doi: 10.1542/neo.3-6-e99.

37. Bassan H, Limperopoulos C, Visconti K, et al. Neurodevelpmental outcome in survivors of periventricular hemorrhagic infarction. Pediatrics. 2007;120(4):785–792. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-0211.

38. Walgen NG, Ahmed NA. Neuroprotection in cerebral ishaemia: facts and fancies-the need for new approaches. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2004;17 Suppl 1:153–166. doi: 10.1159/000074808.

39. Fukuda S, Kato T, Kakita H, et al. Hemodynamics of cerebral arteries of infants with periventricular leukomalcia. Pediatrics. 2006;117(1):1–8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1719.

40. Neirobiologicheskie osnovy vozniknoveniya i vosstanovitel’nogo lecheniya perinatal’nogo porazheniya TsNS u detei. Ed by L.S. Namazova-Baranova. Moscow: Pediatr»»; 2016. 184 p. (In Russ).

41. Zakharova LI, Tupikova SA. Opportunities of neuroprotective therapy for perinatology. Ulyanovsk medicobiological journal. 2017;(3):62–71. (In Russ). doi: 10.23648/UMBJ.2017.27.7077.

42. Philchenkov AA. Caspases as regulators of apoptosis and other cell functions. Biokhimiia. 2003;68(4):453–466. (In Russ).

43. Chamnanvanakij S, Margraf LR, Burns D, Perlman JM. Apoptosis and white matter injury in preterm infants. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2002;5(2):184–189. doi: 10.1007/s10024-001-0205-0.

44. Gomazkov OA. Neirogenez kak adaptivnaya funktsiya mozga. Moscow: Ikar; 2013. 136 p. (In Russ).

45. Austin T, O’Reilly H. Advances in imaging the neonatal brain. Expert Opin Med Diagn. 2011;5(2):95–107. doi: 10.1517/17530059.2011.554819.

46. Kwon SH, Vasung L, Ment LR, Huppi PS. The role neuroimaging in predicting neurodevelopmental outcomes of preterm neonates. Clin Perinatol. 2014;41(1):257–283. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2013.10.003.

47. Nosarti C, Walshe M, Rushe TM, et al. Neonatal ultrasound results following very preterm birth predict adolescent behavioral and cognitive outcome. Dev Neuropsychol. 2011;36(1):118–135. doi: 10.1080/87565641.2011.540546.

48. Krivtsova LA, Belsky VV. Neurovisualization methods of a forecast design of outcomes of cerebral ischemia in the children of the first year of life. Journal of new medical technologies. 2013;20(2):423–427. (In Russ).

49. van Wezel-Meijler G, Steggerda SJ, Leijser LM. Cranial ultra-sonography in neonates: role and limitatio ns. Semin Perinatol. 2010;34(1):28–38. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2009.10.002.

50. Freeman JM. The use of amplitude-integrated electroencephalography: beware of its unintended consequences. Pediatrics. 2011;119(3):615–617. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-3650.

51. Veselova AN, Vatolin KV. Printsipy diagnostiki i lecheniya narushenii mozgovogo krovotoka pri gipoksicheski-ishemicheskikh porazheniyakh TsNS u novorozhdennykh detei. Vestnik pediatricheskoi farmakologii i nutritsiologii. 2007;4(4):51–55. (In Russ).

52. Timoshenko VN. Nedonoshennye novorozhdennye deti. Uchebnoe posobie. Rostovna-Donu; 2007. 184 p. (In Russ).

53. Dyussenova SB, Кorneyeva YA, Dombrovskaya IL. Consequences posthypoxic changes of the brain in children: clinical features and diagnosis. Advances in current natural sciences. 2014;(7):9–11. (In Russ).

54. Beaino G, Khoshnood B, Kaminski M, et al. Predictors of cerebral palsy in very preterm infants: the EPIPAGE prospective population-based cohort study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2010;52(6):e119–125. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2010.03612.x.

55. Nosarti C. Neurodevelopmental outcomes of preterm birth: from childhood to adult life. Nosarti C, Murray R, Hack M, editors. Cambridge: University Press; 2010. pp. 39–53.

56. Edwards AD, Arthurs OJ. Paediatric MRI under sedation: is it necessary? What is the evidence for the alternatives? Pediatr Radiol. 2011;41(11):1353–1364. doi: 10.1007/s00247-011-2147-7.

57. Hillenbrand CM, Reykowski A. MR imaging of the newborn: a technical perspective. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2012;20(1):63–79. doi: 10.1016/j.mric.2011.08.010.

58. Arthurs OJ, Edwards A, Austin T, et al. The challenges of neonatal magnetic resonance. Pediatr Radiol. 2012;42(10):1183–1194. doi: 10.1007/s00247-012-2430-2.

59. Neubauer V, Griesmaier E, Baumgartner K, et al. Feasibility of cerebral MRI in non-sedated preterm-born infants at term-equivalent age: report of a single centre. Acta Paediatr. 2011;100(12):1544– 1547. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2011.02388.x.

60. Mathur A, Neil JJ, Inder TE. Understanding brain injury and neurodevelopmental disabilities in the preterm infant: the evolving role of advanced MRI. Semin Perinatol. 2010;34(1):57–66. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2009.10.006.

61. Mamed»yarov AM, Namazova-Baranova LS, Ermolina YV, et al. Assessment of motor and sensory pathways of the brain using diffusion-tensor tractography in children with cerebral palsy. Annals of the Russian academy of medical sciences. 2014;69(9–10):70–76. (In Russ).] doi: 10.15690/vramn.v69i9-10.1134.

62. Tusor N, Arichi T, Counsell SJ, et al. Brain development in preterm infants assessed using advanced MRI techniques. Clin Perinatol. 2014;41(1):25–45. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2013.10.001.

63. Doria V, Arichi T, Edwards DA. Magnetic resonance imaging of the preterm infant brain. Curr Pediatr Rev. 2014;10(1):48–55. doi: 10.2 174/157339631001140408120821.

64. Smyser С, Kidokoro H, Inder T. MRI of the brain at term equivalent age in extremely premature neonates — to scan or not to scan? J Paediatr Child Health. 2012;48(9):794–800. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2012.02535.x.

65. Hoon AH Jr, Vasconcellos Faria A. Pathogenesis, neuroimaging and management in children with cerebral palsy born preterm. Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2010;16(4):302–312. doi: 10.1002/ddrr.127.

66. Ermolina YV, Namazova-Baranova LS, Mamedyarov AM, et al. The ole of diffusion-tensor magnetic resonance imaging and tractography in the diagnosis of structural brain disorders in children with cerebral palsyy. Current pediatrics. 2016;15(2):141–147. (In Russ).] doi: 10.15690/vsp.v15i2.1531.

67. Ermolina YuV. Osobennosti strukturnykh i funktsional’nykh izmenenii golovnogo mozga u detei s tserebral’nymi paralichami. [dissertation abstract] Moscow; 2016. 24 p. (In Russ).

68. Government Executive Order RF dated 31 August 2016 goda №1839-r. (In Russ). Доступно по: https://government.consultant.ru/ documents/3712398. Ссылка активна на 12.01.2018.

69. Baranov AA, Al’bickij VJu, Terleckaja RN, Zelinskaja DI. Mnogourovnevaja sistema okazanija medicinskoj pomoshhi detskomu naseleniju. Voprosy sovremennoj pediatrii. 2014;13(2):5–10. [(In Russ).

70. Vygotskii LS. Sobranie sochinenii. Vol. 2, 5. Moscow: Izd-vo Eksmo, 2005. 1136 p. (In Russ).

71. Psikhologopedagogicheskaya diagnostika razvitiya detei rannego i doshkol’nogo vozrasta. Metodicheskoe posobie. Ed by E.A. Strebeleva. Moscow: Prosveshchenie; 2005. (In Russ).

72. Diagnostika i kompleksnaya reabilitatsiya perinatal’noi patologii novorozhdennykh detei. Ed by G.V. Yatsyk. Moscow: Pediatr»»; 2012g. 156 p. (In Russ).

73. Lazurenko SB. Psikhicheskoe razvitie detei s narusheniyami zdorov’ya v rannem vozraste. Moscow: Logomag; 2014. 266 p. (In Russ).

74. Lazurenko SB. Organizatsiya v uchrezhdeniyakh sistemy zdravookhraneniya korrektsionno-pedagogicheskoi pomoshchi detyam s porazheniem TsNS (metodicheskoe pis’mo). Moscow: FGUP TsBNTI Roszdrava; 2008. 60 p. (In Russ).

75. Printsipy etapnogo vykhazhivaniya nedonoshennykh detei. Ed by Namazova-Baranova LS. Moscow: Pediatr””; 2013. pp. 171–237. (In Russ).

76. Zavidova SS, Namazova-Baranova LS, Topolyanskaya SV. Cinical trials of drugs in pediatrics: problems and achievements. Pediatric pharmacology. 2010;7(1):6–14. (In Russ).

77. Tatochenko VK. Vaccination of premature/low-birth-weight children. Pediatric pharmacology. 2013;10(4):30–36. (In Russ). doi: 10.15690/pf.v10i4.752.

78. Kazakova KA, Namazova-Baranova LS, Davidova IV, et al. Primary serological status and immunological efficacy of vaccination against Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae type b in children with bronchopulmonary dysplasia: a cohort study. Pediatric pharmacology. 2018;15(1):43–49. (In Russ). doi: 10.15690/pf.v15i1.1842.

79. Zubova EP, Farrakhov AZ, Shavaliev RF, Sadykov MM. Outpatient care of children with development disorders at the early age. Meditsinskii al’manakh. 2014;(1):10–14. (In Russ).

80. Polunina VV, Suyundukova AS, Sergeenko EYu, et al. Outpatient rehabilitation of children with health deviations. Current pediatrics. 2011;10(6):14–19. (In Russ).

81. Yanovskaya NV, Evtushenko OS, Evtushenko SK. Metodika reabilitatsii detei 1-go goda zhizni s zaderzhkoi motornogo i predrechevogo razvitiya (ugrozhaemykh po razvitiyu tserebral’nogo paralicha) v usloviyakh spetsializirovannogo statsionarnogo lecheniya otdeleniya Donetskogo oblastnogo klinicheskogo tsentra neiroreabilitatsii. International neurological journal. 2014;(3):177–178. (In Russ).

82. Belyaeva IA, Bombardirova EP, Tokovaya EI, et al. Non-drug habilitation of children with perinatal affections of the nervous system. Current pediatrics. 2017;16(5):383–391. (In Russ). doi: 10.15690/vsp.v16i5.1802.