Preview

Pediatric pharmacology

Advanced search

Overcoming ‘Anti-Vaccination Scepticism’: Seeking a Solution to the Situation

https://doi.org/10.15690/pf.v15i2.1871

Abstract

Background. The problem of distrust of immunization is widespread not only in Russia but also all over the world. Many parents refuse to vaccinate their child reasoning that the vaccines can harm their health, the immune system may not cope with the body burden; and some doctors themselves discourage parents from vaccination. Our aim was to assess the attitude of doctors and parents towards vaccination whose children are vaccinated completely or partially; to study the most frequent reasons for refusals of vaccination by parents. Methods. We used the questionnaires for parents (n = 114) who brought their children for vaccination for the first time or repeatedly; and the questionnaires for students of 4–6 courses and interns of medical universities (n = 336) who expressed their sentiments towards vaccination and demonstrated the knowledge of the national and regional immunization schedules. AstonGroup also conducted studies among physicians of different specialties (n = 307) on the most frequent reasons for refusals of vaccination. Results. In most cases, the parents’ attitude towards vaccination was positive. One in three patient representatives considered that he was fully acquainted with immunization issues, and more than half wanted to be vaccinated only within the national immunization schedule. In almost 100% of cases, parents had trust in information about vaccination received from a doctor. The results of the AstonGroup survey showed that the most frequent medical exemptions were given by neurologists, immunologists, and surgeons. And the parents themselves, who brought their children to see doctors, reasoned their refusals of vaccination with fear of complications and also considered vaccination to be harmful and useless. The doctors participating in the survey offered methods for influencing the parents, namely: providing them with accessible information about vaccinations included in the national immunization schedule as well as about the experience of using vaccines, including other countries. Discussion. The survey revealed insufficient knowledge of the national immunization schedule among students as well as cautious attitude towards vaccination issues and the trust in vaccination myths among legally authorized representatives of patients. Conclusion. The effective measures to combat ‘anti-vaccination scepticism’ are lectures for parents; personal, social and health education at pediatric sites as well as continuing medical education.

About the Authors

Tatiana A. Kaliuzhnaia
National Medical Research Center for Children’s Health, Moscow; Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow
Russian Federation


Marina V. Fedoseenko
National Medical Research Center for Children’s Health, Moscow
Russian Federation


Leyla S. Namazova-Baranova
National Medical Research Center for Children’s Health, Moscow; Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow
Russian Federation


Anna G. Gaivoronskaya
National Medical Research Center for Children’s Health, Moscow
Russian Federation


Firuza Ch. Shakhtakhtinskaya
National Medical Research Center for Children’s Health, Moscow
Russian Federation


Natalia E. Tkachenko
National Medical Research Center for Children’s Health, Moscow
Russian Federation


Marika I. Broeva
National Medical Research Center for Children’s Health, Moscow
Russian Federation


Tatiana E. Privalova
National Medical Research Center for Children’s Health, Moscow; Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow
Russian Federation


Elena A. Vishneva
National Medical Research Center for Children’s Health, Moscow
Russian Federation


Dariya S. Chemakina
National Medical Research Center for Children’s Health, Moscow
Russian Federation


Yuliya Yu. Kasatkina
National Medical Research Center for Children’s Health, Moscow
Russian Federation


Ksenia М. Gaivoronskaya
Morozov Children’s City Clinical Hospital, Moscow
Russian Federation


References

1. Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation №125n «Ob utverzhdenii natsional’nogo kalendarya profilakticheskikh privivok i kalendarya profilakticheskikh privivok po epidemicheskim pokazaniyam» (s izmeneniyami i dopolneniyami ot 16.06.2016; 13.04.2017) dated 21 March 2014. (In Russ).

2. Baibusinova AZh, Musakhanova AK, Shalgumbaeva GM. Knowledge, attitude, barriers regarding vaccination current situation: review. Nauka i zdravookhranenie. 2016;(3):123–134. (In Russ).

3. Zverev VV, Yuminova NV. Vaccines. Prevention of viral infections from E. Jenner to date. Vopr Virusol. 2012;(S1):33–42. (In Russ).

4. Lin Y, Huang L, Nie S, et al. Knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) related to the pandemic (H1N1) 2009 among Chinese general population: a telephone survey. BMC Infect Dis. 2011;11:128. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-11-128.

5. Hyde TB, Dentz H, Wang SA, et al. The impact of new vaccine introduction on immunization and health systems: a review of the published literature. Vaccine. 2012;30(45):6347–6358. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.08.029.

6. Measles. Fact sheet. WHO. (In Russ). Доступно по: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs286/ru/. Ссылка активна на 02.03.2018.

7. Lomakin AG. Rezul’taty otsenki effektivnosti vaktsin protiv grippa. Klyuchevye aspekty obespecheniya kachestva proizvodstva vaktsin. Moscow; 2017. (In Russ).

8. who.int [Internet]. Diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis and combined vaccines (DTP): Recommendations for Diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis and combined vaccines, Amendments 2003; Requirements for Diphteria, Tetanus, Pertussis and Combined Vaccines [cited 2018 Feb 12]. Available from: http://www.who.int/biologicals/publications/trs/areas/vaccines/dtp/en/

9. Diphtheria vaccine – WHO position paper 2006. (In Russ). Доступно по: http://www.who.int/vaccines-dicuments/DocsPDF/www9637.pdf. Ссылка активна на 02.03.2018.

10. Orenstein WA, Ahmed R. Simply put: vaccination saves lives. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(16):4031–4033. doi: 10.1073/ pnas.1704507114.

11. Taylor B, Miller E, Farrington C, et al. Autism and measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine: no epidemiological evidence for a causal association. Lancet. 1999;353(9169):2026–2029. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)01239-8.

12. Andrews N. Thimerosal exposure in infants and development disorders: a retrospective cohort study in the United Kingdom does not support a causal association. Pediatrics. 2004;114(3):584– 591. doi: 10.1542/peds.2003-1177-l.

13. Semenov BF, Tatochenko VK. Immunoprophylaxis of pediatric infections: results and prospects. Pediatric pharmacology. 2006;3(1):41–44. (In Russ).

14. Kulichenko TV, Dymshits MN, Lazareva MA, et al. Violation of the child vaccination calendar: the attitudes of doctors and parents. Pediatric pharmacology. 2015;12(3):330–334. (In Russ). doi: 10.15690/pf.v12i3.1361.

15. Larson HJ, de Figueiredo A, Xiahong Z, et al. The State of Vaccine Confidence 2016: global insights through a 67-country survey. EBioMedicine. 2016;12:295–301. doi: 10.1016/j.ebi-om.2016.08.042.

16. Gaivoronskaya AG, Fedoseenko MV, Kalyuzhnaya TA, et al. Rezul’taty analiza anketirovaniya roditelei po voprosam vaktsinoprofilaktiki. (Conference pro-ceedigs) XVII S»ezd pediatrov Rossii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem «Aktual’nye problemy pediatrii»; 2017 feb 17–19; Moscow. (In Russ).

17. Tkachev D. Grazhdane ne ponimayut abstraktnykh razgovorov o vaktsinatsii. (In Russ). Доступно по: https:// aftershock.news/?q=node/458860&full. Ссылка активна на 02.03.2018.


Review

For citations:


Kaliuzhnaia T.A., Fedoseenko M.V., Namazova-Baranova L.S., Gaivoronskaya A.G., Shakhtakhtinskaya F.Ch., Tkachenko N.E., Broeva M.I., Privalova T.E., Vishneva E.A., Chemakina D.S., Kasatkina Yu.Yu., Gaivoronskaya K.М. Overcoming ‘Anti-Vaccination Scepticism’: Seeking a Solution to the Situation. Pediatric pharmacology. 2018;15(2):141-148. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15690/pf.v15i2.1871

Views: 2096


ISSN 1727-5776 (Print)
ISSN 2500-3089 (Online)