Preview

Pediatric pharmacology

Advanced search

Nutritional Status, Physical and Psychomotor Development of Premature Infants: A Prospective Observational Comparative Study

https://doi.org/10.15690/pf.v15i1.1843

Abstract

Background. The development of premature infants is slower than that of term ones, often due to nutritional status disorders in preterm infants. Objective. Our aim was to study the nutritional status, physical, and psychomotor development of infants.

Methods. Nutritional status — the composition (the ratio of fat and fat-free tissues) and the value of lean body mass (LBM) — was assessed by plethysmography and densitometry; physical development — by measuring the mass and length of the body, the circumference of the head and chest, calculating the body mass index (BMI); psychomotor development — assessing compliance with the schedule of neuropsychological development of infants (GNOM). The examination was carried out at 12–14 and 16–18 weeks of the corrected age for preterm and actual age for full-term infants. Initially, the diet of infants was assessed by determining the amount, content of macronutrients and energy in the breast milk and/or milk formula and complementary food consumed. The diet was considered to be balanced if the diet parameters diverged not more than 10% of the norm.

Results. The study included 23 preterm infants with extremely low (ELBW), 20 — with very low (VLBW), 34 — with low body weight (LBW), and 33 full-term infants. At 12–14 weeks of the corrected age, the magnitude of LBM in infants with ELBW — 3,397 (3,096; 3,608) and with VLBW — 3,824 (3,797; 3,899) was lower than in infants with LBW — 4,497 (4,034; 4,651) and full-term infants — 4,511 (3,887; 4,647) (Kruskal–Wallis test, p = 0.048). Protein balanced diet was in 2 (9%) infants with ELBW, energy balanced diet — in 1 (4%) infant. Among infants with ELBW, 17/23 (74%) referred to the risk group, 6/23 (26%) — to the developmental disorder group. Compared with infants with ELBW and VLBW, infants with LBW and full-term infants had a higher LBM and, correspondingly, higher body weight and BMI. Improvement of the nutritional status after 4–6 weeks due to correction of protein and energy consumption in infants with ELBW was accompanied by some increase in lean body mass, while its proportion was much higher and the proportion of fat mass was lower, which was accompanied by an improvement in the psychomotor development in individual infants: 5/23 (22%) became age-appropriate, and in the risk group of developmental disorders, the proportion of infants decreased from 17 (74%) to 13/23 (57%). The obtained results testify to the influence of nutritional status on the physical and psychomotor development of infants.

Conclusion. The importance of dynamic assessment of the nutritional status of premature infants with individualized correction of their diet for improving the physical and psychomotor development of the child during the first year of life is shown.

About the Authors

Tatiana V. Turti
National Scientific and Practical Center of Children’s Health; Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Russian Federation

Moscow



Anna A. Gorbacheva
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Russian Federation

Moscow



Olga L. Lukoyanova
National Scientific and Practical Center of Children’s Health
Russian Federation

Moscow



References

1. Национальная программа оптимизации вскармливания детей первого года жизни в Российской Федерации. — М.; 2011. — 68 с. [Natsional’naya programma optimizatsii vskarmlivaniya detei pervogo goda zhizni v Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Moscow; 2011. 68 p. (In Russ).]

2. Клиническая диетология детского возраста / Под ред. Т.Э. Боровик, К.С. Ладодо. — М.: МИА; 2015. — С. 20–23. [Klinicheskaya dietologiya detskogo vozrasta. Ed by T.E. Borovik, K.S. Ladodo. Moscow: MIA; 2015. pp. 20–23. (In Russ).]

3. Ong KK, Kennedy K, Castaneda-Gutierrez E, et al. Postnatal growth in preterm infants and later health outcomes: a systematic review. Acta Paediatr. 2015;104(10):974–986. doi: 10.1111/apa.13128.

4. Байбарина Е.Н., Сорокина З.Х. Исходы беременности в сроки 22–27 нед в медицинских учреждениях Российской Федерации // Вопросы современной педиатрии. — 2011. — Т.10. — №1 — С. 17–20. [Baybarina YN, Sorokina ZK. Outcomes of 22–27 weeks of pregnancy in health care institutions of the Russian Federation. Current pediatrics. 2011;10(1):17–20. (In Russ).]

5. Принципы этапного выхаживания недоношенных детей / Под ред. Л.С. Намазовой-Барановой. — М.: ПедиатрЪ; 2013. — 240 с. [Printsipy etapnogo vykhazhivaniya nedonoshennykh detei. Ed by L.S. Namazova-Baranova. Moscow: Pediatr»»; 2013. 240 p. (In Russ).]

6. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJ, et al. Births: final data for 2013. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2015;64(1):1–65.

7. Намазова-Баранова Л.С., Турти Т.В., Лукоянова О.Л., и др. Лечебное питание с применением специализированного детского молочного продукта для энтерального питания с повышенным содержанием белка и энергии у детей первого года жизни с белково-энергетической недостаточностью // Педиатрическая фармакология. — 2016. — Т.13. — №1 — С. 27–32. [NamazovaBaranova LS, Turti TV, Lukoyanova OL, et al. Clinical nutrition involving a specialized protein and calorie-rich pediatric milk product for enteral feeding of infants with protein-calorie deficiency. Pediatric pharmacology. 2016;13(1):27–32. (In Russ).] doi: 10.15690/pfv13i1/1511.

8. Cooke RJ, Griffin I. Altered body composition in preterm infants at hospital discharge. Acta Paediatr. 2009;98(8):1269–1273. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2009.01354.x.

9. Agostoni C, Buonocore G, Carnielli VP, et al. Enteral nutrient supply for preterm infants: commentary from the European Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Committee on Nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2010;50(1):85–91. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e3181adaee0.

10. Беляева И.А., Намазова-Баранова Л.С., Тарзян Э.О., Скворцова В.А., Болдакова И.А. Особенности физического развития и состава тканей недоношенных детей, получавших различные виды вскармливания (при выписке из стационара второго этапа выхаживания) / Вестник Российской академии медицинских наук. 2014;69(5-6):71-80. DOI:10.15690/vramn.v69i5-6.1047. Belyaeva I.A., Namazova-Baranova L.S., Tarzyan E.O., Skvortsova V.A., Boldakova I.A. Peculiarities of Physical Growth and Body Composition of Preterm Infants, Received Different Types of Feeding, at the Discharge from Hospital. Annals of the Russian academy of medical sciences. 2014;69(5-6):71-80. (In Russ.) DOI:10.15690/vramn.v69i5-6.1047

11. Баранов А.А., Намазова-Баранова Л.С., Беляева И.А., и др. Оценка нутритивного статуса недоношенных детей методом воздушной плетизмографии: первое российское проспективное наблюдение // Вестник Российской академии медицинских наук. — 2013. — Т.68. — №4 — С. 10–16. [Baranov AA, Namazova-Baranova LS, Belyaeva IA, et al. Evaluation of premature infants nutritional status by air plethysmography: first Russian prospective study. Annals of the Russian academy of medical sciences. 2013;68(4):10–16. (In Russ).] doi: 10.15690/vramn.v68i4.605.

12. Simon L, Frondas-Chauty A, Senterre T, et al. Determinants of body composition in preterm infants at the time of hospital discharge. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014;100(1):98–104. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.113.080945.

13. de Zegher F, Sebastiani G, Diaz M, et al. Body composition and circulating high-molecular-weight adiponectin and IGF-I in infants born small for gestational age: breast- versus formula-feeding. Diabetes. 2012;61(8):1969–1973. doi: 10.2337/db11-1797.

14. Franz AR, Pohlandt F, Bode H, et al. Intrauterine, early neonatal, and postdischarge growth and neurodevelopmental outcome at 5.4 years in extremely preterm infants after intensive neonatal nutritional support. Pediatrics. 2009;123(1):e101–109. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-1352.

15. Химический состав российских пищевых продуктов. Справочник / Под ред. И.М. Скурихина, В.А. Тутельяна. — М.: ДеЛипринт; 2002. — 236 с. [Khimicheskii sostav rossiiskikh pishchevykh produktov. Spravochnik. Ed by I.M. Skurikhin, V.A. Tutel’yan. Moscow: DeLi print; 2002. 236 p. (In Russ).]

16. Нормы физиологических потребностей в энергии и пищевых веществах для различных групп населения Российской Федерации. — М.; 2008. [Normy fiziologicheskikh potrebnostei v energii i pishchevykh veshchestvakh dlya razlichnykh grupp naseleniya Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Moscow; 2008. (In Russ).]

17. Рациональное вскармливание недоношенных детей. Методические указания. — М.: Союз педиатров России; 2010. — 72 с. [Ratsional’noe vskarmlivanie nedonoshennykh detei. Metodicheskie ukazaniya. Moscow: Soyuz pediatrov Rossii; 2010. 72 p. (In Russ).]

18. Ramel SE, Gray HL, Ode KL, et al. Body composition changes in preterm infants following hospital discharge: comparison with term infants. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2011;53(3):333–338. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e3182243aa7.

19. Hack M, Merkatz IR, Mcgrath SK, et al. Catch-up growth in very-low-birth-weight infants. Clinical correlates. Am J Dis Child. 1984;138(4):370–375. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1984.02140420036013.

20. Olhager E, Tornqvist C. Body composition in late preterm infants in the first 10 days of life and at full term. Acta Paediatr. 2014;103(7):737–743. doi: 10.1111/apa.12632.

21. Bavdekar AR, Vaidya UV, Bhave SA, Pandit AN. Catch up growth and its determinants in low birth weight babies: a study using Z scores. Indian Pediatr. 1994;31(12):1483–1490.

22. Corpeleijn WE, Kouwenhoven SM, van Goudoever JB. Optimal growth of preterm infants. World Rev Nutr Diet. 2013;106:149–155. doi: 10.1159/000342584.

23. Bertino E, Di Nicola P, Giuliani F, et al. Evaluation of postnatal growth of preterm infants. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011;24 Suppl 2:9–12. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2011.601921.

24. Camelo JS Jr, Martinez FE. [Nutritional dilemmas in extremely low birth weight infants and their effects on childhood, adolescence and adulthood. (In Portuguese).] J Pediatr (Rio J). 2005;81(1 Suppl):S33–42. doi: 10.2223/jped.1298.

25. Pfister KM, Gray HL, Miller NC, et al. Exploratory study of the relationship of fat-free mass to speed of brain processing in preterm infants. Pediatr Res. 2013;74(5):576–583. doi: 10.1038/pr.2013.138.

26. Ramel SE, Gray HL, Christiansen E, et al. Greater early gains in fat-free mass, but not fat mass, are associated with improved neurodevelopment at 1 year corrected age for prematurity in very low birth weight preterm infants. J Pediatr. 2016;173:108–115. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.03.003.

27. Huang P, Zhou JH, Yin YA, et al. Effects of breast-feeding compared with formula-feeding on preterm infant body composition: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Nutr. 2016;116(1):132–141. doi: 10.1017/S0007114516001720.

28. de Betue CT, van Waardenburg DA, Deutz NE, et al. Increased protein-energy intake promotes anabolism in critically ill infants with viral bronchiolitis: a double-blind randomised controlled trial. Arch Dis Child. 2011;96(9):817–822. doi: 10.1136/adc.2010.185637.

29. Clarke SE, Evans S, MacDonald A, et al. Randomized comparison of a nutrient-dense formula with an energy-supplemented formula for infants with faltering growth. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2007;20(4):329–339. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-277X.2007.00805.x.


Review

For citations:


Turti T.V., Gorbacheva A.A., Lukoyanova O.L. Nutritional Status, Physical and Psychomotor Development of Premature Infants: A Prospective Observational Comparative Study. Pediatric pharmacology. 2018;15(1):50-57. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15690/pf.v15i1.1843

Views: 2107


ISSN 1727-5776 (Print)
ISSN 2500-3089 (Online)