Preview

Pediatric pharmacology

Advanced search

The Effectiveness of Using the HandTutor Hand Simulator and Stabilometric Postural Control Using the Biofeedback Tear in Preschool and Primary School Children with Cerebral Palsy

https://doi.org/10.15690/pf.v21i6.2839

Abstract

Background. Currently, mechanotherapy is widely used in the rehabilitation of mainly adult patients and adolescents. The possibilities of using this technique in children of early, preschool and primary school age are limited due to the minimal presence of specialized devices.

The aim of the study is the assessment of the effectiveness of a comprehensive rehabilitation program with the inclusion of a HandTutor hand simulator and stabilometrical postural control using the biofeedback method in preschool and primary school age children suffering from infantile cerebral palsy (ICP).

Materials and methods. 40 children aged 3 to 7 years with motor disorders with a diagnosis of ICP were under observation. The effectiveness of the program was evaluated using scales and hardware measurement data (HandTutor, “Amblyotron”).

Results. According to goniometric changes and data on the Ashworth scale, after rehabilitation, patients demonstrate a greater range of movements than before treatment (p < 0.05). The indicators of the area of the pressure center and its fluctuations have significantly improved in the form of improved stability (p £ 0.01), the pattern of vertical posture, walking and postural control in general.

Conclusion. After treatment, patients showed a marked decrease in the degree of muscle spasticity of the affected limb, an increase in muscle strength, an improvement in fine and large hand motor skills, and manual skills. Thus, the results of the study demonstrate the high effectiveness of biomechanical methods of influence, namely HandTutor and “Amblyotron”, on the motor sphere of patients with severe motor disorders.

About the Authors

Ulviya Sh. Ashrafova
Research Institute of Pediatrics and Children’s Health in Petrovsky National Research Centre of Surgery
Russian Federation

Ulviia Sh. Ashrafova, MD

10, Fotievoy Str., building 1, Moscow, 119333


Disclosure of interest:

Not declared



Ayaz M. Mamedyarov
Research Institute of Pediatrics and Children’s Health in Petrovsky National Research Centre of Surgery
Russian Federation

Aiaz M. Mamedyarov, MD, PhD

Moscow

 


Disclosure of interest:

Not declared



Elena K. Karmazina
Research Institute of Pediatrics and Children’s Health in Petrovsky National Research Centre of Surgery
Russian Federation

Elena K. Karmazina, MD

Moscow


Disclosure of interest:

Not declared



Olga A. Klochkova
Research Institute of Pediatrics and Children’s Health in Petrovsky National Research Centre of Surgery
Russian Federation

Olga A. Klochkova, MD, PhD

Moscow


Disclosure of interest:

Not declared



Olga S. Kuprianova
Research Institute of Pediatrics and Children’s Health in Petrovsky National Research Centre of Surgery
Russian Federation

Olga S. Kuprianova, MD

Moscow


Disclosure of interest:

Not declared



References

1. Ashrafova USh, Kupriianova OS, Karmazina EK, et al. A personalized approach to application of robotic mechanotherapy methods in children with cerebral palsy of different age groups. Pediatricheskaya farmakologiya — Pediatric pharmacology. 2023;20(6):588–596. (In Russ). https://doi.org/10.15690/pf.v20i6.2668

2. Makarova MR, Lyadov KV, Kochetkov AV. The role of exercise equipment and devices in motor rehabilitation of patients with neurological disorders. Doctor.Ru. 2012;(10):54–62. (In Russ).

3. Meyer-Heim A, van Hedel HJ. Robot-assisted and computerenhanced therapies for children with cerebral palsy: current state and clinical implementation. Semin Pediatr Neurol. 2013;20(2):139– 145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spen.2013.06.006

4. Meyer-Heim A, Borggräfe I, Ammann-Reiffer C, et al. Feasibility of robotic-assisted locomotor training in children with central gait impairment. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007;49(12):900–906. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2007.00900.x

5. Suvorova TN, Gribova NP. Patient rehabilitation in the early recovery timeline of ischemic stroke. Experience of biofeedback stabilization training. RMJ. 2024;(4):3–7. (In Russ).

6. Zhuang M, Wu Q, Wan F, et al. State-of-the-art noninvasive brain — computer interface for neural rehabilitation: a review. J Neurorestoratol. 2020;8(1):12–25. https://doi.org/10.26599/JNR.2020.9040001

7. Yoo JW, Lee DR, Cha YJ, You SH. Augmented effects of EMG biofeedback interfaced with virtual reality on neuromuscular control and movement coordination during reaching in children with cerebral palsy. NeuroRehabilitation. 2017;40(2):175–185. https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-161402

8. Liao WC, Lai CL, Hsu PS, et al. Different weight shift trainings can improve the balance performance of patients with a chronic stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(45):132. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000013207

9. Najafi Z, Rezaeitalab F, Yaghubi M, Manzari ZS. The Effect of Biofeedback on theotorMuscular Situation in Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients: a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Caring Sci. 2018;7(2):89–93. https://doi.org/10.15171/jcs.2018.014

10. Saita K, Morishita T, Arima H, et al. Biofeedback effect of hybrid assistive limb in stroke rehabilitation: A proof of concept study using functional near infrared spectroscopy. PLoS One. 2018;13(1):e0191361. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191361

11. Palisano R, Rosenbaum P, Walter S, et al. Development and reliability of a system to classify gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1997;39(4):214–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.1997.tb07414.x

12. Bohannon RW, Smith MB. Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther. 1987;67(2):206– 207. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/67.2.206

13. Suponeva NA, Yusupova DG, Ilyina KA, et al. Validation of the Modified Ashworth scale in Russia. Annals of clinical and experimental neurology. 2020;14(1):89–96. (In Russ). https://doi.org/10.25692/ACEN.2020.1.10

14. Araújo PA, Kirkwood RN, Figueiredo FM. Validity and intraand inter-rater reliability of the Observational Gait Scale for children with spastic cerebral palsy. Braz J Phys Ther. 2009;13(13):267–273.

15. Bayındır O, Akyüz G, Sekban N. The effect of adding robot-assisted hand rehabilitation to conventional rehabilitation program following stroke: A randomized-controlled study. Turk J Phys Med Rehab. 2022;68(2):254–261. https://doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2022.8705

16. Carmeli E, Peleg S, Bartur G, et al. HandTutor™ enhanced hand rehabilitation after stroke--a pilot study. Physiother Res Int. 2011;16(4):191–200. https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.485

17. Kaladinova TI, Medetbekova ZhA. The effectiveness of motivation in the rehabilitation of patients with movement disorders in the hand on the simulator Hand Tutor. Kazakh Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. 2019;(2):49–52. (In Russ).

18. Aretinskij VB, Telegina EV, Volkova LI. Recovery of motor function of the hand of stroke patients using the “Hand tutor”. Ural Medical Journal. 2014;(9):46–49. (In Russ).

19. Medvedeva EY, Olkhina EA. Using the appliance Hand Tutor in speech therapy to children with dysarthria. Perspectives of Science & Education. 2017;(6):92–96. (In Russ).

20. Larina NV, Pavlenko VB, Korsunskaya LL, et al. Rehabilitation possibilities for children with cerebral palsy through the use of robotic devices and biofeedback. Bulletin of Siberian Medicine. 2020;19(3):156–165. (In Russ). https://doi.org/10.20538/1682-0363-2020-3-156-165


Review

For citations:


Ashrafova U.Sh., Mamedyarov A.M., Karmazina E.K., Klochkova O.A., Kuprianova O.S. The Effectiveness of Using the HandTutor Hand Simulator and Stabilometric Postural Control Using the Biofeedback Tear in Preschool and Primary School Children with Cerebral Palsy. Pediatric pharmacology. 2024;21(6):481-491. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15690/pf.v21i6.2839

Views: 218


ISSN 1727-5776 (Print)
ISSN 2500-3089 (Online)